DC placement decisions and mode selection strategies are revisited every 3-5 years in formal network studies, but the competitive and cost landscape shifts continuously. Most organizations lack the analytical infrastructure to evaluate cost-to-serve by lane and customer segment, leaving them unable to determine whether adding a DC, shifting volume to intermodal, or renegotiating FTL contracts would generate the most meaningful reduction in total delivered cost per unit.
Built For
VP of Supply Chain Strategy evaluating a 3-DC consolidation vs 5-DC regional expansion decision for a $2B omnichannel retailer
Deploy a pre-trained specialist agent instantly instead of building one from scratch.
Network Design Analyst
Models DC placement scenarios, cost-to-serve by segment, and mode selection tradeoffs across the distribution network.
Transportation Analyst
Evaluates lane-level mode selection between LTL, FTL, and intermodal based on transit time, cost, and volume thresholds.
Operations Planner
Assesses operational feasibility of network restructuring scenarios, including DC staffing ramp-up and throughput capacity constraints.
Network optimization modeling that evaluates DC placement scenarios, LTL vs FTL vs intermodal mode tradeoffs, and cost-to-serve by customer segment to identify the highest-impact network restructuring moves.
Drag and drop your CSVs and start analyzing right away, with the complex pipelines handled for you.
Ask questions in plain English, get instant answers.
Consolidating to 3 DCs lowers total delivered cost about 8% (roughly $14M a year) by collapsing fixed facility and labor overhead, but average transit time rises from 1.8 to 2.6 days and SLA attainment on your premium segment drops from 96% to about 91%. The swing factor is the West region, which loses next-day coverage. Keeping the Reno DC and consolidating only the three eastern sites captures most of the savings while protecting the premium-segment SLA.